Monday, January 19, 2009
Some MLK quotes.....
Sunday, January 18, 2009
the top-10 most sold NBA jerseys in China
Here’s a list of the top-10 most sold NBA jerseys in China just before the Olympics:
1. Kobe Bryant
2. Kevin Garnett
3. Tracy McGrady
4. Paul Pierce
5. Allen Iverson
6. Gilbert Arenas
7. LeBron James
8. Dwayne Wade
9. Dwight Howard
10. Yao Ming
America:
TOP 15 PLAYER JERSEY SALES LIST:
1. Kobe Bryant – Los Angeles Lakers
2. Dwyane Wade – Miami Heat
3. LeBron James – Cleveland Cavaliers
4. Allen Iverson – Denver Nuggets
5. Carmelo Anthony – Denver Nuggets
6. Steve Nash – Phoenix Suns
7. Vince Carter – New Jersey Nets
8. Gilbert Arenas – Washington Wizards
9. Shaquille O’Neal – Miami Heat
10. Stephon Marbury – New York Knicks
11. Dirk Nowitzki – Dallas Mavericks
12. Tracy McGrady – Houston Rockets
13. Paul Pierce – Boston Celtics
14. Chris Paul – New Orleans/OK City Hornets
15. Tim Duncan – San Antonio Spurs
Just thought the differences in ordering was interesting. Tracy McGrady is still popular somewhere. And Yao is still top 10 in Asia after everyone has bought one or two of his jerseys already.
Friday, January 16, 2009
Off-the-court superstars
Forgive me for my lack of journalistic integrity--and effort--in submitting this post. I am not, in actuality, posting to offer information, but instead to ask a simple question. As the article shows, though, Steve Kerr was wrong, but only by degree. They were SO capable that Shaq has ballooned to average 21 and 10 in his last month of basketball. They are also the same trainers that restored Amare Stoudemire's microfractured knee, who have made Grant Hill look like he's back in his twenties, and have kept Steve Nash on the court the past 3 seasons, bad back and all.
Some guys are just going to have injuries, and there are many teams who don't have anything to offer to adequately heal the wounds of some of their players. But the Suns staff has definitely proven that they are among the best in the business at restoring health to players who sometimes haven't experienced health in a long time.
Thinking about this, my mind immediately jumped to the other side of the spectrum and wondered...is it unfair to be as critical of some teams as we are complimentary of the Suns? Case-in-point: the Orlandooooo Magic! How many players can you name off the top of YOUR head with ties to Orlando who had derailing injuries that led to declines in their careers? And note, I'm not even saying the injuries happened in Orlando, just that the player has ties. I can think of three in particular:
1. Tracy McGrady - back problems started there, worsened in Houston
2. Grant Hill - ankle injury kept him bench-ridden for much of three seasons
3. Penny Hardaway - went from great to gone in less than 5 seasons after injuries hit
Now in complete fairness, the same staff was able to keep Darrell Armstrong's frail bones on the court, which is a feat. Also, the current Magic staff has kept Dwight Howard on the court for nearly every game of his career, which is incomprehensible for a seven-footer.
Still, in that era...either their injuries were progressed beyond the help of their current medicine, or there was some mishandling (which there definitely was in the case of Grant Hill).
So that's my question--is it reading too much into things to say that trainers are this valuable? Clearly the Suns staff is doing a phenomenal job, but is it too much to assume that all trainers are having that much of an impact on their teams, for good or for bad? I'm gonna look into it further...maybe do some actual research on the thing. While some guys are built like tanks and avoid injury with sheer will (LeBron), and other guys have high thresholds for pain (maybe Paul Pierce, unless you're a Lakers fan), it would seem like a great training staff can be the difference between a physically-prepared, 58-win team and a physically-drained, 52-win team at the end of the season.
The true meaning of CLUTCH. Michael Jordan who?

Wednesday, January 14, 2009
Update: Barack Obama now has choices for a cell phone.
From Engadget.com
NSA-approved smartphones leaves Obama with some ugly choices
by Ross Miller, posted Jan 13th 2009 at 6:33PM
Have you ever seen such statistical FOOLISHNESS in your life?! Look at the game leaders for Cleveland....
No credible threats to the Super Bowl....what's the deal with this venue?

According to an article from ESPN, The FBI is stating that their are no credible threats to SuperBowl XLIII, although there are plenty of credible concerns about effectively securing the venue. According to the article, A joint FBI and Homeland Security intelligence assessment cautions that Raymond James Stadium, the site of Super Bowl XLIII, does not have the typical security features of permanently secure buildings and arenas.
Monday, January 12, 2009
Just for clarification: How the NBA chooses which games to blackout...

From Direct TV:
Blackout Rules for NBA Games
Blackout restrictions apply to all NBA games that are offered on NBA LEAGUE PASS. Such blackout restrictions are designed to protect the television rightsholders in the competing teams' respective home markets. Blackouts are not based on arena sellouts.Local Broadcasts
If a local over-the-air network has the rights to broadcast an NBA game in its local area, customers in that area will be unable to receive that game via their satellite service. However, they may be able to see the game via their local channels.
Example of How Blackouts Work
The Lakers are playing the Rockets and both teams are broadcasting the game locally — KCAL-9 in the Los Angeles area and FSN SOUTHWEST in the Houston area. NBA LEAGUE PASS subscribers living in the Los Angeles area will be blacked out within the Lakers' over-the-air territory. To see the game, they must be able to receive KCAL. Subscribers living outside of the KCAL coverage area will receive the game via NBA LEAGUE PASS unless they live in the Houston area. Subscribers in the Houston area will be blacked out of the game in NBA LEAGUE PASS, but subscribers can view the game on their over-the-air television station or their local regional sports network (RSN) — included with CHOICE programming and Local Channels.
I'm not so sure it completely works like this though.
For instance, how does it work in a city with no NBA team? My parents live in Huntsville, AL where my Dad is a die-hard New York Knicks fan. However, occassionally he is unable to get a Knicks game on League Pass with little to no explanation outside of the black screen saying "This game is not available in your area." Considering there is NO NBA team within 35 miles, I fail to see how anyone living in an area such as Huntsville (or any other relatively remote city) should not be able to see ANY game going on in the US? In the case of the Knicks, I hypothesize that it has to do with the MSG network's discretion.It's already public knowledge the NBA doesn't black out games due to attendance (unlike the NFL), so why wouldn't a customer in an area with no NBA team affiliation be able to see any NBA game being offered by League Pass? Confusing. It also gets confusing/irritating for me, living in College Station, TX. League Pass here restricts me from seeing any Rockets games. Understood, because my area still falls under the Houston local broadcast control so I can (or should) be able to see it on FSN Southwest. When the Dallas Mavericks play, for some reason, I am not able to get those games on LP due to blackout restrictions as well. I am still not even sure how FSN Southwest works as far as Houston Rockets game broadcasts vs. Dallas Mavericks Broadcast. Is there a separate FSN Southwest channel in Dallas that carries the Mavericks like they do in Houston (Clifton?).What are the exact rules for blackouts? I've read online that NBA fans are furious in Austin because all San Antonio Spurs games are blacked out for them. The weird thing is that the local area Spurs broadcasts are not available in any way in Austin, so most residents would have no other way to follow the Spurs unless they had League Pass. As great as League Pass is, I would love for them to have a uniform set of rules they followed which would allow those not in a NBA team affiliated area to see EVERY game available.
From Direct TV:
Blackout Rules for NBA Games
Blackout restrictions apply to all NBA games that are offered on NBA LEAGUE PASS. Such blackout restrictions are designed to protect the television rightsholders in the competing teams' respective home markets. Blackouts are not based on arena sellouts.Local Broadcasts
If a local over-the-air network has the rights to broadcast an NBA game in its local area, customers in that area will be unable to receive that game via their satellite service. However, they may be able to see the game via their local channels.
Example of How Blackouts Work
The Lakers are playing the Rockets and both teams are broadcasting the game locally — KCAL-9 in the Los Angeles area and FSN SOUTHWEST in the Houston area. NBA LEAGUE PASS subscribers living in the Los Angeles area will be blacked out within the Lakers' over-the-air territory. To see the game, they must be able to receive KCAL. Subscribers living outside of the KCAL coverage area will receive the game via NBA LEAGUE PASS unless they live in the Houston area. Subscribers in the Houston area will be blacked out of the game in NBA LEAGUE PASS, but subscribers can view the game on their over-the-air television station or their local regional sports network (RSN) — included with CHOICE programming and Local Channels.
I'm not so sure it completely works like this though.
For instance, how does it work in a city with no NBA team? My parents live in Huntsville, AL where my Dad is a die-hard New York Knicks fan. However, occassionally he is unable to get a Knicks game on League Pass with little to no explanation outside of the black screen saying "This game is not available in your area." Considering there is NO NBA team within 35 miles, I fail to see how anyone living in an area such as Huntsville (or any other relatively remote city) should not be able to see ANY game going on in the US? In the case of the Knicks, I hypothesize that it has to do with the MSG network's discretion.It's already public knowledge the NBA doesn't black out games due to attendance (unlike the NFL), so why wouldn't a customer in an area with no NBA team affiliation be able to see any NBA game being offered by League Pass? Confusing. It also gets confusing/irritating for me, living in College Station, TX. League Pass here restricts me from seeing any Rockets games. Understood, because my area still falls under the Houston local broadcast control so I can (or should) be able to see it on FSN Southwest. When the Dallas Mavericks play, for some reason, I am not able to get those games on LP due to blackout restrictions as well. I am still not even sure how FSN Southwest works as far as Houston Rockets game broadcasts vs. Dallas Mavericks Broadcast. Is there a separate FSN Southwest channel in Dallas that carries the Mavericks like they do in Houston (Clifton?).What are the exact rules for blackouts? I've read online that NBA fans are furious in Austin because all San Antonio Spurs games are blacked out for them. The weird thing is that the local area Spurs broadcasts are not available in any way in Austin, so most residents would have no other way to follow the Spurs unless they had League Pass. As great as League Pass is, I would love for them to have a uniform set of rules they followed which would allow those not in a NBA team affiliated area to see EVERY game available.
The NBA's best kept secret: Danny Granger has the skills of a SUPERSTAR.
| |||
2008-09 Statistics
Born: Apr 20, 1983 Height: 6-8 / 2,03 Weight: 228 lbs. / 103,4 kg. College: New Mexico Years Pro: 3 | |||
Friday, January 09, 2009
Are the Portland Trailblazers Crazy??

From the NBA CBA:
Section 1. No Collusion.
Subject to Section 2 below, no NBA Team, its employees or agents, will enter into any contracts, combinations or conspiracies, express or implied, with the NBA or any other NBA Team, their employees or agents: (a) to negotiate or not to negotiate with any Veteran or Rookie; (b) to submit or not to submit an Offer Sheet to any Restricted Free Agent; (c) to offer or not to offer a Player Contract to any Free Agent; (d) to exercise or not to exercise a Right of First Refusal; or (e) concerning the terms or conditions of employment offered to any Veteran or Rookie.
“The Portland Trail Blazers are aware that certain teams may be contemplating signing Darius Miles to a contract for the purpose of adversely impacting the Portland Trail Blazers Salary Cap and tax positions. Such conduct from a team would violate its fiduciary duty as an NBA joint venturer. In addition, persons or entities involved in such conduct may be individually liable to the Portland Trail Blazers for tortuously interfering with the Portland Trail Blazers’ contract rights and perspective economic opportunities.
“Please be aware that if a team engages in such conduct, the Portland Trail Blazers will take all necessary steps to safeguard its rights, including, without limitation, litigation.”
It's pretty clear to me that in essense, the Trailblazers are threatening to sue any team which signs D. Miles if they believe the team is doing it just to hurt their "tax positions." Ludicrous. The intent of any player signing should not be determined by a team who has the most to lose from it, and threatening to sue a team if they give a free agent work is definitely against the CBA. In essence, they are placing a fiscal obstacle on the signing of a veteran. Has to be illegal. The power to prevent a free agent signing should never reside with a competing team. I mean, from the looks of it, they may sue a rival team in their own conference (Lakers) for doing it compared with not suing the Magic or Heat, it's their discretion. You can't impose your will to determine who will sign who.
Now for this "Fiduciary Duty" claim.
The fiduciary duty is a legal relationship of confidence or trust between two or more parties, most commonly a fiduciary or trustee and a principal or beneficiary. One party, for example a corporate trust company or the trust department of a bank, holds a fiduciary relation or acts in a fiduciary capacity to another, such as one whose funds are entrusted to it for investment. In a fiduciary relation one person justifiably reposes confidence, good faith, reliance and trust in another whose aid, advice or protection is sought in some matter.
I have not found this described anywhere in the CBA at the time of writing this post.
Clifton:
Here’s my thought on the whole matter…I think that the Blazers, entering January, had a right to say “Look, it’s obvious at this point that nobody wants the guy, and anyone who picks him up should at least be under suspicion of doing it for the sole purpose of screwing up our salary cap the next two years.” I think that if that statement is made to the media, it’s totally fair. Where I think they went wrong is in the aggressiveness and tone with which they spoke directly to NBA teams about Miles, almost disregarding the fact that he is a person, and that he probably deserves the benefit of the doubt that he really wants to play, whether or not a team picks him up for that reason. It’s a tough situation for both sides, except now, instead of looking at possibly getting screwed over, the Blazers just went ahead and screwed themselves outright…sucks.
Obama's Blackberry woes....and how to fix them.

I'm not sure if you all have heard, but President Elect Barack Obama is a Blackberry junkie. He carries it with him all the time and loves it. I know many people with blackberries and they all say the same thing: the phones are addictive. You are able to always be in touch, send and receive emails, and communicate with friends and family. However I just read here that the Secret Service is saying he will have to give up his Blackberry the first day he enters office. I know from previous articles that it is a newer model (possibly a blackberry 8700c) from the pictures and that his Cell Phone Carrier is Verizon. If I had to make a guess, I would think there are several security reasons the Secret Service is making him get rid of it. Firstly, all cell phones when actively connected to a cellular network, can be located through triangulation of the towers they are using, or the gps chip built into the phone (all phones since 2003 are required to have some form of gps built in for new 911 emergency standards nationwide.) Having the POTUS carry a hackable location device probably doesn't make the Service's protection job any easier. Secondly, the blackberry's files and information are available to just about any Verizon Customer Service representative that can access customer files by phone number. Obama's other phone, a flip from Verizon, was already illegally accessed by curious Verizon Employees late last year. While those workers were fired, who is to say that someone else wouldn't be able to do the same thing?




