data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f46d/1f46d9c526e27ba727ccd0bf2f26269924c0d3c2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/543c0/543c048995d2664de207664efb58c4d03ac7809c" alt=""
This was what i sent to a friend, and then i fixed it up for YouTube, but then realized it was too big to post, so...yeah, here you go.
---------------
PJ, I agree with you AND Tye in this situation. FIRST off, if the debate is about only writing songs about Jesus then Tye really needs to be more introspective, because nothing about "Good in the Hood" was edifying Christ! But honestly I don't even think that Tye is attacking PJ's situation. When Tye & GA were in the secular world they were there as vocalists and background performers, and they had to follow the lead of whatever the artists were doing, in the way they lived and the songs they sang. PJ is a lead artist who controls his own songs, the lifestyle he lives on the road, the places he will and won't perform, and every other aspect of his career/ministry. So whereas I agree with Tye (and the Bible) that "no man can serve two masters," I think that in his secular experience Tye DID serve two masters, whereas PJ is on a path that, I believe through my own experience with his music, is both God-led and God-inspired.
In my humble opinion, PJ is a CHRISTIAN artist. He reflects Christian principles in his music. A LOT of artists within the genre of "gospel music" perform songs that are less about Jesus and really more about Christian themes and Christian life like PJ's music (Examples: Mary Mary, Kierra Sheard, Karen Clark, Deitrick Hadden, Kirk Franklin, J Moss, etc). So I can't understand why GOSPEL artists get so much leeway in what they can and can't perform, but then a Christian artist who presents a message in seemingly every song is seen as being "out there" or "out of God's will." I think we need to think about this a little bit...
Lastly, here's what I suggest we fix: instead of calling BLACK church music "Gospel" and WHITE church music "Christian" (and yes it's true, check iTunes, Amazon, wherever you want!), why don't we stop defining ourselves and our music by race? We can call songs about Jesus "Gospel music" and songs that exemplify the principles of godly living "Christian music". Then PJ wouldn't have to call himself R&B at all.
But then again, until we stop treating love as a secular principle (1 Cor 13), we are just sounding brass and tinkling cymbals anyway. I'm 25 years old, and it's time to "put away childish things"...like that way of thinking.
PJ, just know that the good folk in Dallas are supporting and praying for your ministry. I mean...career. Lol or whatever they wanna let you call it! God bless.
_____So what do you think on this issue? Hit the comments section, tell me I'm stupid, whatever you desire. Hopefully this debate will lead to positive changes within the gospel music industry. What those changes are, I guess, is what remains to be seen.
PETA and millions of decent football fans around the world are disappointed that the Philadelphia Eagles have chosen to sign a man who hanged dogs from trees, electrocuted them with jumper cables, held them underwater until they drowned in his swimming pool, and even threw his own family dogs into the fighting pit to be torn to shreds while he laughed. What sort of message does this send to young fans who care about animals and don't want to see them be harmed?
PETA certainly hopes that Vick has learned his lesson and feels truly remorseful for his crimes—but since he's given no public indication that that's the case, only time will tell. At this point, all Eagles fans can do is cross their fingers and hope that they won't ever have to explain to their sons and daughters what a "rape rack" is and why their favorite player was using one, as Falcons fans once had to.
Interestingly enough, the statement read on ESPN is exactly like this, except for the last "rape rack" line. ESPN apparently chose not to read it on the air (?). Here is my thing, and my major issue with PETA's involvement/responses.
PETA takes the stance that a
Human life is the equivalent (or less, depending on the wacko you are talking to) then an animal life. This includes fish ( they call them sea kittens!), dogs, cats, pigs (which according to a flier here on campus, are smarter then dogs and human toddlers), flies and even ants (!). I simply do NOT agree. If it was between my girlfriend Ebony dying or her beautiful purebred yorkie (see pic below), well Felicity, you had a good run. And it would be an easy decision. I will always place Humans and their welfare on a
higher rung of my personal priorities then an animal. Sorry. I guess it goes back to even Creation, where Christians believe that humans were "given dominion over them" them being nature and animals.
My issue #2: No where in the constitution or in society is it stated or given that someone who makes a mistake of this nature cannot have a second chance. People do prison time for murder, get out, and (although difficult) find jobs. Same for manslaughter, robbery, and DUI. Are we saying as a society that DUI which ends in the KILLING of a human being (Stallworth, and others) is NOT as bad as killing and torturing animals, and running a kennel/illegal gambling ring? Both times required horrible decisions on the part of the perpetrator to be made. Both showed a lack of respect for life, one human, one animals. Both are frowned upon legally. And even with that said, as bad as both crimes are, I just don't see the correlation. From a technical standpoint, dogs have a lifetime of what, 20 years max? They bring joy and love to families as well as protection. Well what does a human do?! I like to think I will live 70 years or longer, and that I have brought joy and love to my family, as well as some protection to my girlfriend by my presence. THEY AREN'T EQUIVALENT.
I have read the comments posted on the official PETA blog, and some of them are sick too. " I hope he never has happiness?" "He doesn't deserve to LIVE?" "He is SCUM of the EARTH?" I think this takes it a little far. Though I actually would have no problem with Vick sitting down for a Psych evaluation just to see what the results were from a scientific perspective, I have reached the end of my rope when it comes to catering to these special interest groups. They are trying to hold the NFL, Mike Vick, and other fans as hostage until we get rid of Mike Vick from society, That cannot happen. They question "What will this teach our kids about animal abuse?" Well, my humble answer is that it will teach them that it is wrong on a moral and legal level, BUT if you are a world class athlete (or have any valuable job skills of any kind) after you pay your debt to society SOMEONE will want you. In other words, better yourself, and become the best at whatever it is you do. Why is it ok for Mike to suffer through JAIL, loss of of his fortune, and now have his first love (football) taken away, yet for other worse crimes, people talk about how it's rough they can't find work post-prison? I have arrived at the point that I feel PETA will NEVER be happy or pacified as to Michael Vick's presence in the NFL, and they will do everything in their power to disrupt games, practices, and fiscal developments with the NFL and the Eagles. I support the Eagles making this decision, and hope it doesn't cost them to many sponsorships who kowtow to this fringe element. Michael Vick deserves to be allowed the opportunity to find work in a field of his choice, outside of anything to do with dogs. He was approached by a business interested in his talents, and he signed. Deal with it. Boo him. But don't do anything crazy, it won't bring anymore positive press to your cause/organization. It's reputation is pretty bad as it is.
"Reputation is what men and women think of us; character is what God and angels know of us."
…
"Thank God, because my reputation just had gym shorts in it's face!!!"
Thomas Paine (& Shawn Bradley)
![]() | ![]() | |
Phone | HTC Touch Pro (CDMA) | Palm Pre (CDMA) |
Current U.S. Carriers | Alltel Sprint U.S. Cellular Verizon Wireless | Sprint |
Global Availability | Released | Released |
Avg. User Rating | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 3.9 User Reviews | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 3.92 User Reviews |
Add Phone | Remove | Remove |
Specifications | ||
---|---|---|
Modes | CDMA 850 CDMA 1900 | CDMA 850 CDMA 1900 |
Weight | 5.3 oz (150g) | 4.76 oz (135g) |
Dimensions | 4.01" x 2" x 0.71" (102 x 51 x 18 mm) | 3.9" x 2.3" x 0.67" (99 x 58 x 17 mm) |
Form Factor | Slide | Slide |
Antenna | Internal | Internal |
Battery Life | Talk: 3.8 hr Standby: ? | Talk: ? Standby: ? |
Display | LCD (Color TFT/TFD) 480 x 640 pixels 2.8" Colors: 262,144 (18-bit) | LCD (Color TFT/TFD) 320 x 480 pixels 3.1" Colors: 16.7 million (24-bit) |
Platform / OS | Windows Mobile Professional (Pocket PC) | (proprietary) |
Memory | 328 MB | 8 GB |
Phone Book Capacity | shared memory | shared memory |
HTC Touch Pro (CDMA) | Palm Pre (CDMA) | |
Features | ||
GPS / Location | Yes | Yes |
Accessibility | ||
Adjustable Text Size | Yes | - |
Digital TTY/TDD | Yes | Yes |
Hearing Aid Compatible | - | Yes M4 (very compatible) |
Multiple Languages | Yes | Yes |
Alerts | ||
Polyphonic Ringtones | Yes | Yes |
Vibrate | Yes | Yes |
Connectivity | ||
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
PC Sync | Yes | - |
USB | Yes | Yes |
Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
Contacts | ||
Multiple Numbers per Name | Yes | Yes |
Picture ID | Yes | Yes |
Ringer ID | Yes | Yes |
Voice Dialing | Yes Speaker-independent (automatic) | - |
Customization | ||
Custom Graphics | Yes | Yes |
Custom Ringtones | Yes | Yes |
Real-Music Ringers | Yes | Yes |
Data & Network | ||
Data-Capable | Yes | Yes |
Flight Mode | Yes | Yes |
Packet Data | Yes 1xEV-DO rA | Yes 1xEV-DO rA |
WAP / Web Browser | Yes | Yes |
Input | ||
Predictive Text Entry | Yes | - |
Side Keys | Yes | Yes |
Text Keyboard | Yes QWERTY | Yes QWERTY |
Touch Screen | Yes Finger | Yes Finger |
Memory | ||
Memory Card Slot | Yes microSD (TransFlash) | - |
Messaging | ||
Email Client | Yes | Yes |
MMS | Yes * | Yes |
Text Messaging | Yes | Yes |
Text Messaging Templates | Yes | - |
Music | ||
Headphone Jack (3.5mm) | - | Yes |
Music Player | Yes | Yes |
Photo & Video | ||
Camera | Yes 3+ megapixel | Yes 3+ megapixel |
Streaming Video | Yes | Yes |
TV Output | Yes | - |
Video Capture | Yes | - |
Productivity | ||
Alarm | Yes | Yes |
Calculator | Yes | Yes |
Calendar | Yes | Yes |
To-Do List | Yes | Yes |
Voice Memo | Yes | - |
Software | ||
Games | Yes | Yes |
Voice | ||
Speaker Phone | Yes | Yes |
* Some versions only | ||
HTC Touch Pro (CDMA) | Palm Pre (CDMA) |
Blog: |
Page 3 Blog |
Topics: |